In 1993 President Bill Clinton attempted to lift the ban on
homosexuals in the military. It was one of the most contentious
efforts of his administration, sparking months of intense
debate.
Following twelve legislative hearings and field trips, Congress
passed a law codifying and confirming the pre-Clinton policy. That
statute, technically named Section 654, Title 10, P.L. 103-160, is
frequently mislabeled “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” A more accurate name
would have been the “Military Personnel Eligibility Act of 1993.”
The statute, which has been upheld by the courts as constitutional
several times, clearly states that homosexuals are not eligible for
military service.
In 1993 members of Congress gave serious consideration to a
proposal known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” which was announced by
President Clinton on July 19, 1993. The concept suggested that
homosexuals could serve in the military as long as they didn’t say
they were homosexual. Congress wisely rejected the convoluted
“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” concept and did not write it into law.
Members recognized an inherent inconsistency that would render that
policy unworkable and indefensible in court: If homosexuality is
not a disqualifying characteristic, how can the armed forces
justify dismissal of a person who merely reveals the presence of
such a characteristic? Instead of approving such a convoluted and
legally-questionable concept, Congress chose to codify Defense
Department regulations that were in place long before Bill Clinton
took office.
The resulting law, identified as Section 654, Title 10, continued
the long-standing Defense Department policy stating that
homosexuals are not eligible for military service. Following
extensive debate in both Houses, the legislation passed with
overwhelming, veto-proof bipartisan majority votes. In writing this
law, members wisely chose statutory language almost identical to
the 1981 Defense Department Directives regarding homosexual
conduct, which stated that “homosexuality is incompatible with
military service.” Those regulations had already been challenged
and upheld as constitutional by the federal courts.
The 1993 statute was designed to encourage good order and
discipline, not the dishonesty inherent in “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
Congress rejected that concept, and chose instead to codify
unambiguous findings and statements that were understandable,
enforceable, consistent with the unique requirements of the
military, and devoid of the First Amendment conundrums that were
obvious in President Clinton’s July 19 proposal.
A thorough search of media reports at the time, however, reveals
that there were few news stories reporting passage of the law.
Those that did appear in print failed to report its language and
meaning with accuracy. [7] Those reports and convoluted Defense
Department statements since then have confused the issue by
erroneously suggesting that Congress voted for Bill Clinton’s
flawed proposal, known by the catch-phrase “Don’t Ask, Don’t
Tell.”
Describing the law as a “compromise” and referring to it as “Don’t
Ask, Don’t Tell” gave political cover to President Clinton, who had
promised to lift the ban shortly after his election in 1992. In
fact, due to overwhelming public opposition, President Clinton
failed to deliver on his promise. The only “compromise” involved
allowed the Clinton administration to continue its “interim policy”
of not asking “the question” regarding homosexuality that used to
appear on routine induction forms.
http://www.cmrlink.org/HMilitary.asp?docID=336
This organization is based on the opinions of the Lesbian, Gay,
Bisexual, and Transgender identified Department of Defense (DOD)
employees (civilians and military), retirees, veterans, and their
friends and families. It is not intended to reflect the views of
the Federal Department of Defense